From the first impression, this sounds like an algorithmic information theory word salad, but I might be wrong, and this may be a sensible concept. Though I am sure this concept is not “superintelligence” because it doesn’t have any reference point. Ants are superintelligent relative to a cell. Humans are superintelligent relative to dogs. This definition either describes so much that even a simple cellular automaton falls under it, or it is so restrictive that machine intelligence capable of building a Dyson sphere doesn’t fall under it.
I later realized that I constructed this definition so restrictively (insofar as it makes sense at all; I’m still tightening down exactly what I meant) that the only thing that potentially qualifies is the universe itself, the electromagnetic field and everything that it carries.
A better working definition of superintelligence than anything I suspect we have at the moment:
Addressable state space grows faster than the sum of Kolmogorov complexity of addresses and the memory size of the lookup library.
From the first impression, this sounds like an algorithmic information theory word salad, but I might be wrong, and this may be a sensible concept. Though I am sure this concept is not “superintelligence” because it doesn’t have any reference point. Ants are superintelligent relative to a cell. Humans are superintelligent relative to dogs. This definition either describes so much that even a simple cellular automaton falls under it, or it is so restrictive that machine intelligence capable of building a Dyson sphere doesn’t fall under it.
I later realized that I constructed this definition so restrictively (insofar as it makes sense at all; I’m still tightening down exactly what I meant) that the only thing that potentially qualifies is the universe itself, the electromagnetic field and everything that it carries.